>>> 宇明首页| 新闻综合 | 正见新知 | 软件下载 | 影音美文 | 技术参考 | 论坛 |

*宇明旧版

闪画 雅乐 视频 九评三退 沧桑正道 其他热点 民主人权 万象大千 神传文化 软件下载

美文 笑谈 好书 秘闻内幕 天象人间 轮回漫谈 神奇预言 史前文明 科学新见 技术参考

热点新闻排行

法轮功修炼严禁性乱 中共强行栽赃尽显弱智

【章天亮】二十次准确预测政局的玄机(上)

任长霞丈夫暴亡 “模范公安”再引争议

绝密司法文件!曝光中共群体灭绝罪行

神七造假 中共专家承认“气泡门” 美国专家

中共给神韵开出惊人价码:两场演出值数十亿

冲破中国电视网络封锁的P2P软件正式推出

联合国紧急通过决议 中共尴尬“认罪”

传《二奸二假》遭传讯 南京律师直指江泽民

感悟神韵:两小时中展现的惊世奇迹

【特稿】法轮功是中国政局核心及无法逾越关

中国甘肃大暴动 中共疯了(视频/多图)

大纪元十周年庆典 媒体倒闭潮中凸显价值

我感到佛就要来临(图)

2012年前中国六个龙年大事记

【特稿】认识法轮功真相是读懂香港政局的关

章天亮:也谈郭文贵爆料的背后逻辑

美太空专家揭神七疑点 拆穿央视“太空漫步

成功!李娜彻底击碎中共谎言

央视护卡扎菲 逼急利比亚人中文标语揭谎言

大陆人观看09年神韵DVD有感

温家宝:就是武力解决也要拿下周永康

央视春晚是杀人不见血的刀子!

乌坎综合:中共垮台的时间表

神秘的“龙”,是虚幻还是真实?

抗议不如起义!山东东明组敢死队抗暴

请不要错过2009年除夕夜之精彩

大势已去中共哪里是逃路!

你的婚姻和解体共产党有关系!

破网软件风靡中国 警察公开出售

中国爆发禽流感 中共隐瞒疫情残害全人类(

听说这事后,不信神的人也都相信了

女杨佳杀淫官网上猛发酵 民众称大快 喉舌熄

2012新年伊始 新浪微博惊现实名退党宣言

700张高考作文试卷得零0分的启示

 
您的位置:主页>新闻综合>其他热点>列表

《透视“进化论”》第一章(9):众多科学家公开质疑进化论

文章出处:大纪元 发布时间:2024-11-04 作者:《透视“进化论”》写作组 点击:

 
【宇明网】

七、众多科学家公开质疑进化论

世界上许多很有成就的科学家付出很大努力,都找不到支持进化假说的任何科学根据,于是纷纷著书或撰写论文反对达尔文的进化假说。一些有代表性的科学家的评论如下:

7.1 进化论“站不住脚”

新西兰奥塔戈大学(University of Otago, New Zealand)分子生物学家迈克尔‧道顿教授(Prof. Dr. Michael Denton, 1943—)说⁶⁸:

“一百二十年前,怀疑论者可能会宽容,让达尔文主义从怀疑中获益,并允许未来的发现最终可能会填补1859年如此明显的空白;这样的立场今天看来是站不住脚了。”

“自从1859年以来,没有一个科学或经验发现可以证明达尔文‘广进化’中两个基本原理:1. 所有生物都可以追溯到一个本源;2. 生物的适应设计是盲目机遇的结果。”

7.2 进化论“是没有证据且与事实不符的假设”

牛津大学生化学家、药物学家恩斯特‧伯利斯‧柴恩教授(Prof. Dr. Sir Ernst Boris Chain, 1906—1979)与苏格兰生物学家植物学家亚历山大‧弗莱明(Sir Alexander Fleming, 1881—1955)爵士一起,因为发现盘尼西林(Penicillin)的治疗效果而获得1945年诺贝尔生理学或医学奖。

柴恩教授以非常专业严谨的态度研究了达尔文进化论,结论如下⁶⁹:

“一个没有任何科学证据为依据的理论假设。”“他(达尔文)得出结论认为生物发展和适者生存‘完全是偶然突变的结果’,这是‘没有证据且与事实不符的假设’。”“它甚至很难被称为理论。”

“这些经典的‘进化论’,将大量极其复杂和错综复杂的事实严重、过度简化。令我惊讶的是,在漫长的时间里,这个理论竟然被这么多科学家欣然地、如此轻易地、不加批评地吞咽下去!”

7.3 进化论“是达尔文的白日梦”

美国当代杰出生理学家约瑟夫‧马斯特罗保罗教授(Prof. Dr. Joseph A. Mastropaolo)曾在道格拉斯太空公司(Douglas Space Systems)和加州州立大学长滩分校(California State University, Long Beach)等机构做过三十多年的研究和教学工作,在《科学》杂志上发表过22篇学术论文并多次获奖。

他研究进化论后的结论是:“生物能自动发生,是达尔文的白日梦⁷⁰。”

21世纪初的今天,马斯特罗保罗教授预备了1万美金,正等待任何进化论狂热者能拿出实实在在的证据来证明进化论是科学的。⁷¹

7.4 进化论“不是一个可以被验证的科学理论”

德国著名科学哲学家卡尔‧雷蒙德‧波普尔(Prof. Dr. Sir. Karl Raimund Popper, 1902—1994)教授认为:“达尔文主义不是一个可以被验证的理论,而是一种形而上学的研究项目。”⁷²

7.5 进化论“是成年人的童话”

路易斯‧布努尔博士(Dr.Louis Bounoure)在担任法国国家科学研究中心研究主任时曾指出:“进化论是成年人的童话,该理论对科学的进步毫无帮助、毫无用处。”⁷³

7.6 科学家在《自然》杂志上联名质疑进化论

1981年3月12日,《自然》杂志第82页发表了来自英国自然历史博物馆的22位植物学、昆虫学、古生物学、公共服务和动物学系科学家的联合署名信。信中这样写道:“如果认为进化论是事实,又以为进化论已经被最严格的科学方法证实,那么我们就必须坚决反对这样的推断。迄今为止,进化论并没有绝对的证据。若明天有更好的理论出现,进化论马上会被摒弃。”⁷⁴

(第一章为大家疏理了进化假说的逻辑错误、不支持进化假说的实验数据和科学事实。第二章会为大家进一步破除进化假说的基本迷思。待续。)


参考文献:

23. Miller, S. L., Urey, H. C., & Oró, J. (1976). Origin of organic compounds on the primitive earth and in meteorites. Journal of molecular evolution, 9(1), 59–72.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796123

24. Darwin, Charles. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life . London: J. Murray, 1859.
https://www.vliz.be/docs/Zeecijfers/Origin_of_Species.pdf

25. G. A. Kerkut: Implications of Evolution. Pergamon Press (Oxford, 1965), p. 6 (Second edition, 1978). Page 6.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/23401#page/20/mode/1up

26. Lynch, M., Conery, J., & Burger, R. (1995). Mutational Meltdowns in Sexual Populations. Evolution, 49(6), 1067–1080.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2410432; https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.2307/2410432

27. M. Lynch, R. Bürger, D. Butcher, W. Gabriel, The Mutational Meltdown in Asexual Populations, Journal of Heredity, Volume 84, Issue 5, September 1993, Pages 339–344.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111354; https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111354

28. Paul A. Nelson. News and Commentary. Origins & Design 17:1. Colin Patterson Revisits His Famous Question about Evolution.
http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign/od171/colpat171.htm?fbclid=IwAR0jfWBP88HUDXwOJUrxu4hbTjO3hTzQPrcUYMjD-s3gm5lb007MCyl24kc

29. Arthur Ernest Wilder Smith, The Natural Sciences Know Nothing of Evolution, San Diego: Master Books, 1981, p. 133.
https://www.sermon-online.com/en/contents/34551

30. Hancock, Z. B., Lehmberg, E. S., & Bradburd, G. S. (2021). Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: A modern perspective on. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 75(6), 1244.
https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14268

31. Miller SL. A production of amino acids under possible primitive earth conditions. Science 1953;117:528–529.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.117.3046.528; https://sci-hub.st/10.1126/science.117.3046.528

32. Miller, S. L., Urey, H. C., & Oró, J. (1976). Origin of organic compounds on the primitive earth and in meteorites. Journal of molecular evolution, 9(1), 59–72.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796123; https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796123

33. Joseph A. Kuhn (2012) Dissecting Darwinism, Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 25:1, 41-47, DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2012.11928781;
https://sci-hub.st/10.1080/08998280.2012.11928781

34. Towe, K. Aerobic respiration in the Archaean?. Nature 348, 54–56 (1990).
https://doi.org/10.1038/348054a0; https://sci-hub.st/https://www.nature.com/articles/348054a0

35. Towe, K. M. (1978). Early Precambrian oxygen: A case against photosynthesis. Nature, 274(5672), 657-661.
https://doi.org/10.1038/274657a0; https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1038/274657a0

36. Levine J. S. (1982). The photochemistry of the paleoatmosphere. Journal of molecular evolution, 18(3), 161–172.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733042https://sci-hub.st/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01733042

37. Scherer, S. Could life have arisen in the primitive atmosphere?. J Mol Evol 22, 91–94 (1985).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02105809; https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02105809

38. Erich Dimroth and Michael M. Kimberley. 1976. Precambrian atmospheric oxygen: evidence in the sedimentary distributions of carbon, sulfur, uranium, and iron. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences. 13(9): 1161-1185.
https://doi.org/10.1139/e76-119; https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1139/e76-119

39. NORDEN, B. Was photoresolution of amino acids the origin of optical activity in life?. Nature 266, 567–568 (1977).
https://doi.org/10.1038/266567a0; https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1038/266567a0.

40. Feng, L. (2022). Nebula-Relay Hypothesis: The Chirality of Biological Molecules in Molecular Clouds. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.794067.

41. McCombs, C. 2004. Evolution Hopes You Don’t Know Chemistry: The Problem with Chirality. Acts & Facts. 33 (5).
https://www.icr.org/article/evolution-hopes-you-dont-know-chemistry-problem-wi

42. Joseph A. Kuhn (2012) Dissecting Darwinism, Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 25:1, 41-47, DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2012.11928781;
https://sci-hub.st/10.1080/08998280.2012.11928781

43. Orgel, L. E. (1994). The Origin of Life on the Earth. Scientific American, 271(4), 76-83.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24942872

44. Dr. Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Published by Adler & Adler, Distributed by Woodbine House,1985, p. 263.
https://archive.org/details/evolutiontheoryi0000dent/page/n5/mode/2up(complete version);
https://alta3b.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/crisis1.pdf(This is not a complete version)

45. Robertson, M., Miller, S. An efficient prebiotic synthesis of cytosine and uracil. Nature 375, 772–774 (1995).
https://doi.org/10.1038/375772a0

46. Joyce, G. RNA evolution and the origins of life. Nature 338, 217–224 (1989).
https://doi.org/10.1038/338217a0

47. Orgel, L. E. (1994). The Origin of Life on the Earth. Scientific American, 271(4), 76-83.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24942872

48. Elizabeth Pennisi, The Man Who Bottled Evolution. Science 342, 790-793(2013). DOI:10.1126/science.342.6160.790

49. Richard Lenski. Telliamed Revisited. We Interrupt this Nasty Virus with Some Good News about Bacteria.
https://telliamedrevisited.wordpress.com/2020/02/24/we-interrupt-this-nasty-coronavirus-with-some-good-news-about-bacteria/

50. Baron EJ. Classification. In: Baron S, editor. Medical Microbiology. 4th edition. Galveston (TX): University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston; 1996. Chapter 3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK8406/

51. Blount, Z. D., Barrick, J. E., Davidson, C. J., & Lenski, R. E. (2012). Genomic Analysis of a Key Innovation in an Experimental E. coli Population. Nature, 489(7417), 513.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11514

52. Fox, J. W., & Lenski, R. E. (2015). From Here to Eternity–The Theory and Practice of a Really Long Experiment. PLoS biology, 13(6), e1002185.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002185

53. Good, B., McDonald, M., Barrick, J. et al. The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations. Nature 551, 45–50 (2017).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24287https://sci-hub.st/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24287

54. Elizabeth Pennisi, The Man Who Bottled Evolution. Science342, 790-793(2013).DOI:10.1126/science.342.6160.790

55. Cooke, A. ., Bruton, M. N., & Ravololoharinjara, M. . (2021). Coelacanth discoveries in Madagascar, with recommendations on research and conservation. South African Journal of Science, 117(3/4).
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2021/8541

56. Darwin, C. R. 1875. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray. 2d edition. Volume 1.
http://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F880.1&viewtype=text&pageseq=1

57. Trujillo, J.M., Stenius, C., Christian, L.C. et al. Cromosomes of the horse, the donkey, and the mule. Chromosoma 13, 243–248 (1962).
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00577041

58. Zhang, N., Bao, Y., Xie, Z., Huang, X., Sun, Y., Feng, G., Zeng, H., Ren, J., Li, Y., Xiong, J., Chen, W., Yan, C., & Tang, M. (2019). Efficient Characterization of Tetraploid Watermelon. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 8(10), 419.
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8100419

59. Ouyang, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2018). The molecular and evolutionary basis of reproductive isolation in plants. Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao, 45(11), 613–620.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2018.10.004

60. Phillip E. Johnson. Darwin On Trial. Used with permission of Phillip E. Johnson and Regnery Gateway Publishing Co.  Electronically Enhanced Text (c) Copyright 1993 World Library, Inc. Copyright 1991.
http://maxddl.org/Creation/Darwin%20On%20Trial.pdf

61. Carl Wieland and Don Batten. An interview with leading Australian molecular biologist and microbiologist Ian Macreadie.
https://creation.com/creation-in-the-research-lab

62. Mora-Bermúdez, F., Badsha, F., Kanton, S., Camp, J. G., Vernot, B., Köhler, K., Voigt, B., Okita, K., Maricic, T., He, Z., Lachmann, R., Pääbo, S., Treutlein, B., & Huttner, W. B. (2016). Differences and similarities between human and chimpanzee neural progenitors during cerebral cortex development. eLife, 5, e18683.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18683

63. King, C., & Wilson, A. C. (1975). Evolution at Two Levels in Humans and Chimpanzees. Science.
https://doi.org/1090005; https://sci-hub.st/https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1090005

64. Varki, A., & Altheide, T. K. (2005). Comparing the human and chimpanzee genomes: searching for needles in a haystack. Genome research, 15(12), 1746–1758.
https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3737405

65. The Chimpanzee Sequencing and Analysis Consortium. (2005). Initial sequence of the chimpanzee genome and comparison with the human genome. Nature, 437(7055), 69-87.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04072

66. ​​Kronenberg, Z. N., Fiddes, I. T., Gordon, D., Murali, S., Cantsilieris, S., Meyerson, O. S., Underwood, J. G., Nelson, B. J., P. Chaisson, M. J., Dougherty, M. L., Munson, K. M., Hastie, A. R., Diekhans, M., Hormozdiari, F., Lorusso, N., Hoekzema, K., Qiu, R., Clark, K., Raja, A., . . . Eichler, E. E. (2018). High-resolution comparative analysis of great ape genomes. Science. https://doi.org/aar6343

67. Suntsova, M.V., Buzdin, A.A. Differences between human and chimpanzee genomes and their implications in gene expression, protein functions and biochemical properties of the two species. BMC Genomics 21 (Suppl 7), 535 (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-06962-8

68. Dr. Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis, Published by Adler & Adler, Distributed by Woodbine House,1985.
https://alta3b.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/crisis1.pdf

69. JERRY BERGMAN, PH.D.Ernst Chain: Antibiotics Pioneer. TUESDAY, APRIL 01, 2008.
https://www.icr.org/article/ernst-chain-antibiotics-pioneer

70. Evolution Is Biologically Impossible by Joseph Mastropaolo. Acts and Facts 28 (11): i-iv, Impact #317, November 1999.
https://home.csulb.edu/~jmastrop/data2.html

71. Joseph Mastropaolo.
http://creationwiki.org/index.php?title=Joseph_Mastropaolo

72. Frank J. Sonleitner. What Did Karl Popper Really Say About Evolution?
https://ncse.ngo/what-did-karl-popper-really-say-about-evolution

73. Louis Bounoure, Le Monde et la Vie(Oct. 1963), from Wysong, Creation/Evolution, 418; also in The Advocate (Australian) (Mar. 8, 1984), 17.http://www.thyword.ca/creatqts.html; RUTH WILSON. EVOLUTION IS NOT SCIENCE! THE VIRGINIAN-PILOT. Copyright (c) 1996, Landmark Communications, Inc.DATE: Thursday, April 11, 1996. https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/VA-news/VA-Pilot/issues/1996/vp960411/04110004.htm

74. Extract from The letter was signed by 22 of the museum’s staff of “distinguished biologists.” Nature, 12 March 1981: vol. 290, p. 82.
https://www.nature.com/articles/290082d0.pdf

宇明固定域名 http://yuming.qxbbs.org

[读者投稿与反馈(欢迎留言!)] [返回顶部↑]

相关文章:
 

川普胜选感言:拯救我们的国家,恢复美国的伟大

红朝乱象:以电诈为名“远洋捕捞” 摆明了就是要讹你的钱

《透视“进化论”》第一章(9):众多科学家公开质疑进化论

《透视“进化论”》第一章(8):人不是猴子变的

《透视“进化论”》第一章(7):“种瓜得瓜,种豆得豆”对“进

王友群:《九评》问世二十年 中共亡党在眼前

《透视“进化论”》第一章(6):验证“进化假说”的科学实验结

《透视“进化论”》第一章(5):进化论假说难以成立的前提条件

《透视“进化论”》第一章(4):根本的错误:用物种之内"变异"推

《透视“进化论”》第一章(3):进化论实质上一直停留在假说

[ 关 闭 本 页 ]


请使用IE5.0 以上 最佳分辨率1024*768
Copyright(C)2003-2008 YuMing site all rights reserved.
版权所有: 宇明小站 Copyright (C)2003-2008 ,保留全部权利 ,欢迎转载!
特别声明:本站新闻只代表文章作者的观点和陈述